The controversy surrounding the ownership of 76 oil wells, central to the maritime boundary dispute between Cross River State and Akwa Ibom State, continues to generate significant ripples across Nigeria's political landscape. This protracted contention, rooted in a Supreme Court judgment that affirmed Akwa Ibom's ownership, has once again brought into focus the historical positions of key figures, particularly Senator Victor Ndoma-Egba, former Leader of the 7th Senate.
Key Takeaways
-
The dispute over 76 oil wells between Cross River and Akwa Ibom States remains a live issue, reactivating historical grievances.
-
Former Senate Leader Victor Ndoma-Egba has been accused of reneging on his stance regarding the ceding of Bakassi and the oil wells.
-
Ndoma-Egba firmly denies these allegations, asserting his unwavering support for Cross River State's efforts to reclaim the wells.
-
Analysis of his past Senate interventions reveals a consistent position advocating for Cross River's interests, including compensation and a review of treaty procedures.
-
His current backing of Governor Bassey Otu's efforts aligns directly with his established historical advocacy.
Historical Context of the Dispute
At the heart of the current friction is the Supreme Court of Nigeria's judgment, which followed the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling ceding the Bakassi Peninsula to Cameroon. This legal precedent subsequently transferred the ownership of the 76 oil wells, previously managed by Cross River State, to Akwa Ibom State. The economic implications for Cross River State have been profound, leading to persistent calls for redress and renewed efforts by the current administration under Governor Bassey Otu to revisit the issue.
The current governors, Bassey Otu of Cross River and Umo Eno of Akwa Ibom, are actively presenting their respective cases, underscoring the high stakes involved. The historical context, particularly the circumstances surrounding the initial ceding and subsequent judicial pronouncements, remains a contentious subject for many in Cross River State.
Allegations of Inconsistency Against Ndoma-Egba
Amidst these renewed efforts, a social media post by Atuekong Paul Bassey last week Friday ignited a fresh round of controversy. The post attributed a remark to Senator Ndoma-Egba, suggesting he supported the decision to cede Bakassi and the subsequent loss of the 76 oil wells. The quote, presented as evidence, stated: "In many ways, Bakassi is now part of the Cameroon following the judgment of the ICJ (International Court of Justice). The Supreme Court (of Nigeria) also delivered its judgment. We are a law-abiding people. Since we are law-abiding, we accept the judgment of the Supreme Court concerning the 76 oil wells. The least Nigeria can do is to protect and compensate Cross River State."
This interpretation quickly fueled speculation and criticism, particularly regarding Ndoma-Egba's loyalty to Cross River State's long-standing claims. The timing of the post, coinciding with heightened political activity around the oil wells, amplified its impact.
Ndoma-Egba's Resolute Defense
Responding swiftly to what he termed "deliberate blackmail," Senator Ndoma-Egba issued a press release unequivocally rejecting the misrepresentation of his position. He clarified that the post emerged in the wake of his declared total support for Governor Otu's renewed efforts to reclaim the oil wells, viewing the allegations as an attempt to create a "sense of disloyalty."
His statement firmly asserted: "Let me state clearly, unequivocally, and without ambiguity that I stand firmly and completely with His Excellency, Governor Bassey Edet Otu, and the government and people of Cross River State on all matters concerning Bakassi and our rightful 76 oil wells." He characterized the Bakassi issue as a deeply emotional and historic concern, not a matter for political manipulation or cheap blackmail. Ndoma-Egba stressed his consistent loyalty to Cross River State's interests throughout his public service, dismissing the allegations as "baseless insinuations or politically motivated narratives aimed at sowing division." He reiterated his full support for Governor Otu's "lawful and constitutional efforts" and called for unity amongst stakeholders.
Unpacking His Senate Stance
Examination of Senator Ndoma-Egba's interventions on the floor of the Nigerian Senate during his tenure as Leader provides crucial context. His arguments, captured in public records, consistently articulated a multi-faceted defense of Cross River's interests:
-
Hasty Ceding: Ndoma-Egba contended that the Federal Government acted with undue haste in complying with the ICJ verdict to cede Bakassi, arguing for a more measured approach.
-
Separate Fates: He highlighted the unique injustice wherein Bakassi was ceded to Cameroon, while simultaneously, the 76 oil wells that were historically part of Cross River's economic base were transferred to Akwa Ibom. He emphasized that the ceding occurred "in spite of Cross River State and in spite of the Senate," accusing the Federal Government of failing to adequately protect the state's interests.
-
Call for Compensation: A consistent demand was for the Federal Government to provide substantial compensation to the people of Cross River State, recognizing the profound economic and territorial loss.
-
Treaty Procedure Review: Ndoma-Egba critically questioned the treaty-making process, specifically noting that the Green Tree Agreement, pertaining to Bakassi, did not receive the requisite authorization from the Senate before federal assent.
These points underscore a historical position that is not only consistent with, but indeed foundational to, the current efforts by Governor Otu. His advocacy in the Senate was robust, focused on legal, economic, and constitutional avenues for redress.
Public Sentiment
The recent social media accusations, swiftly countered by Senator Ndoma-Egba, underscore the deeply emotional and politically charged nature of the Bakassi and oil wells issue. While a segment of public discourse, as represented by the Facebook post, sought to challenge Ndoma-Egba's perceived consistency, his detailed rebuttal and documented historical record aim to solidify public perception of his unwavering commitment to Cross River's cause. This ongoing exchange reflects the broader sentiment of vigilance and demand for accountability from political leaders concerning matters of territorial integrity and economic justice.
Conclusion
Based on a review of historical records, including Senator Ndoma-Egba's interventions in the 7th Senate, and his recent emphatic statements, it is evident that his position on the Bakassi Peninsula and the 76 oil wells has remained consistent. His current unwavering support for Governor Otu's initiatives to reclaim the oil wells is not a deviation, but rather a continuation of his long-standing advocacy for Cross River State's legitimate interests. The attempt to paint a picture of disloyalty appears unfounded when viewed against the backdrop of his documented contributions and steadfast commitment to the state.